Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: bleacher creature
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 90 of 407. Next Document

Copyright 2003 Daily News, L.P.  
Daily News (New York)

October 16, 2003, Thursday SPORTS FINAL EDITION

SECTION: SPORTS; Pg. 76 BLEACHER CREATURE

LENGTH: 586 words

HEADLINE: HECKLING COMFORTS CREATURES

BYLINE: BY FILIP BONDY

BODY:
Hard to believe, but apparently not everybody is bleeding pinstripes in the autumnal spirit of the right-field fans. Outside the parking garage yesterday by the Stadium, Police Officer Gerard Urciouli was vowing to make life miserable for as many Bleacher Creatures as possible.

"I hate the Creatures and their big mouths, and you can write that," said Urciouli, who is from the Bronx but is a big Met fan. "They're all from New Jersey, Connecticut, the outer suburbs. The real fans from the city, they root for the Mets."

Urciouli said he hoped the Red Sox win the series, which is like hoping that beer is free at Stan's on River Ave. during the World Series, instead of seven bucks. A couple of cops with Urciouli said they'd been up to Fenway this week and that the fans there were all very nice. "Much softer," one cop said, like that's something the Creatures should aspire to.

Then Urciouli cheered his approval at a Boston fan walking by the Stadium, dressed in red, as the guy passed through the alleyway.

"Tell them to watch their mouths," Urciouli told the Filip Creature, about his friends. "And tell them we want Blue Lou."

Well, it's a little difficult to get back to the business of being a Creature after an encounter like that one, but one has to make the effort. The police presence before and during games is so pervasive, the Creatures have been forced to drink beer out of paper bags or, worse, wimpy paper cups.

You do what you have to do, in order to be there when Boston loses another series. The Creatures debated whether they preferred beating the Sox in six or seven games, because each had its advantages. Victory in six would have allowed Bald Ray (who is from Brooklyn, Urciouli should know) to attend the Colombian Club dance at the United Nations tonight. He is a regular at these U.N. dances, and highly recommends them.

But victory in seven would give the Creatures a shot at heckling and ruining Pedro Martinez, which was tempting as well.

In either case, everybody agreed it was good to eliminate the Red Sox in New York, instead of beating them in four or five games at Boston.

"They just don't get it," Mike Donahue said, about the few Red Sox fans who dare visit the bleachers. "No matter how many times they watch the same movie, they don't want to believe it ends the same way. But it does. You can watch 'Titanic' all you want, the boat still sinks every time."

Blue Lou, unintimidated by police officers or political correctness, said it was time to tell Red Sox fans to "go home and kick their dogs." Then the Creatures started thinking ahead to the World Series, without yet knowing at the time whether it would be against the Marlins or Cubs.

The Yankees have already beaten the Braves, the Padres, the Mutts. They would have beaten the Diamondbacks in 2001, but too much political weirdness was going on at the time to distract the team and the Creatures. It wasn't easy deciding which city, Chicago or Miami, better deserved to be demoralized and humiliated by the Creatures.

Most voted for Miami, because the weather was better, and tickets would be easier to get. Donahue said that playing the Cubs would be, "like beating up a kid with glasses." America would hate the Creatures, even more than usual.

Then the wind kicked up again, blowing a plastic bag clear over the roof of an adjacent building, and knocking an empty beer cup down below, near yet another police officer. The cup missed. No harm, no ticket.

E-mail: fjbondy@netscape.net



LOAD-DATE: October 16, 2003




Previous Document Document 90 of 407. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2005 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.